Friend of David Thorne
David Thorne’s conviction was based entirely on the false confession of Joseph Wilkes, who was intimidated by detectives and threatened with the death penalty. Joe has since recanted
Showing posts with label Yvonne Layne.David Thorne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yvonne Layne.David Thorne. Show all posts
Friday, May 17, 2013
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Friends
When you see who still stands behind you after a wrongful conviction, you will see who is your true friend. To them you're not "some guy who used to be my friend". You're simply, "my friend". The others were never really your friends anyway.
Sunday, April 21, 2013
So Many Visitors
The police estimate that Yvonne Layne was murdered at 10:00 pm. They give no reason for giving this time and it is not related to the coroner's findings. Three men admit in statements that they individually visited Yvonne at or near the time of her death on March 31st, 1999, the first being seen in the victim's driveway with her at 7:30 p.m. They all deny involvement in her death. Either one of them is lying and they actually committed the murder, or including the murderer, 4 different people stopped by the victim's house at approximately the same time, none bumping into the others.
Friday, March 29, 2013
The Other Door
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Locard's Principle on evidence
Wherever he steps, whatever he touches, whatever he leaves,
even unconsciously, will serve as a silent witness against him. Not only his
fingerprints or his footprints, but his hair, the fibers from his clothes, the
glass he breaks, the tool mark he leaves, the paint he scratches, the blood or
semen he deposits or collects. All of these and more, bear mute witness against
him. This is evidence that does not forget. It is not confused by the
excitement of the moment. It is not absent because human witnesses are. It is
factual evidence. Physical evidence cannot be wrong, it cannot perjure itself,
it cannot be wholly absent. Only human failure to find it, study and understand
it, can diminish its value." - Locard's Principle
Friday, March 15, 2013
Judge Richard Reinbold (Trial judge for David Thorne)
Judge Richard Reinbold (Trial judge for David Thorne): "But if I
am correct in my characterization of trial counsel's strategy, it would have
been counterproductive to bring in such expert (forensic) testimony. In other
words, if trial counsel chose the other path, who cares about the blood
splatter, who cares about blood stains on couch pillow cases, and who cares
about bloody footprints."
WHO CARES? I do. Anyone who cares about justice should. The
trial judge CERTAINLY should.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



