Showing posts with label unsolved. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unsolved. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Injustice in Alliance

 
Injustice in Alliance:  The Wrongful Conviction of David Thorne and Joe Wilkes

Free David Thorne

 
 
https://plus.google.com/112773920675983664546/about
http://freedavidthornedeniedjustice.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/FreeDavidThorne
Website: www.wcodt.org
Facebook: Free David Thorne
Facebook: Wrongful Conviction of David Thorne
Connect with us to know the truth!

A Sex Crime?

 
 
Condoms scattered on the victim's bedroom floor. I would immediately think she was intimately involved with someone relative to the time of her death. This was never a motive to this police department. Probably because they were all lining up to point their fingers at fellow cops and accusing each other of having sexual relations with the victim.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Free David Thorne


Truth Fears No Questions

 
David volunteered to take a polygraph test immediately upon appearing for questioning. The detectives refused him one, saying only they can authorize polygraph tests and they weren't giving him one. David has never refused to answer any question asked of him by me, the media, the attorney or anyone. He is innocent. Free David Thorne.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Brady v Maryland

 
 
According to Brady v Maryland, all exculpatory evidence must be turned over to the defense by the prosecution. If the prosecution withholds evidence and they convict the defendent, he can appeal the verdict based on the Brady violation. The problem with that scenario is, you're appealing your conviction to the Judge that presided over your trial and believed you were guilty in the first place.

Nothing is Impossible

 
Nothing is Impossible

Monday, May 13, 2013

Elaine - Supporter of David Thorne


Exonerate

ex·on·er·ate

  Definition of EXONERATE

  1: to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship

2: to clear from accusation or blame

— ex·on·er·a·tion noun

— ex·on·er·a·tive adjective

Intimacy a Selective Issue?



This area of the victim's bedroom was littered with sexual objects. Under her bed there was reportedly many sexual "toys", none of which made it to evidence. She was reportedly having sexual relationships with many police officers. This was never considered a crime with a sexual motive even though David Thorne was arrested due to the fact that he had been intimately involved with her. If that alone was motive, why were no policemen interviewed concerning this crime?

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

What About The Children?

 
Yvonne's children were locked into their bedroom sometime before the murder. The killer either knew their grandmother would arrive at the house the next morning to take Preston to school and discover them, or had no problem with them being locked inside the room for however long after the murder. If their grandmother had not come to the house, it could have been that they were locked away for days.

"I don't know"

 
 
Joseph Wilkes, the man that initially confessed to being hired to commit the murder, responded on the stand 138 times with the response "I don't know", or something similar, would you believe that he was being truthful about his involvement in the crime?  The truth never changes.  It's only when you lie that you can't remember the answers given previously.

Monday, May 6, 2013

Spoiled Brat Rich Kid


Detectives called David Thorne a "smartass" and a "spoiled brat rich kid". They coerced Joseph Wilkes into confessing to a crime he didn't commit and implicating David Thorne. While initially interviewing David, detectives said to him, "Help us help you". David's answer was, "What? You think I did this?" Being incredulous evidently made David a "smartass". All three of those detectives know they coerced Joe and had him implicate David. They all know they are innocent. How do they tell themselves that's alright? This is not justice.

Saturday, April 27, 2013

Invalid Confession of Joe Wilkes



In court under oath, Joe Wilkes stated that he was saying "what they told me to say" as he pointed at the prosecutors. He has recanted his confession. Joe testified at David's post-conviction hearing to these facts and told how the police coerced him into implicating David and how they denied him an attorney. The court ruled that was not enough to warrant giving David Thorne a new trial. One would have to wonder, what is enough?

Friday, April 26, 2013

Experience

 
 
No matter how devoted an advocate we are. No matter how loving a family member. No matter what we go through while someone we care about is behind bars. None of us has any idea or could ever fully comprehend what a wrongfully incarcerated inmate goes through. There are no words that can make us fully understand. It's an experience that can only be understood through the experience itself.