This shoe is enormous. It's a size 13. That's the size shoe Joe Wilkes wore. It wasn't found to be a part of evidence at the crime scene, but rather is being held up by a store clerk at a local sporting goods store. Since no footwear was... recovered in the investigation and bloody footprints were found at the scene, detectives took this photo to enter as evidence. Remarkably, the defense did not object to this. They also failed to mention or probably even notice that the bloody footprints were a size 10, which makes it impossible for Joe Wilkes to have made them.
David Thorne’s conviction was based entirely on the false confession of Joseph Wilkes, who was intimidated by detectives and threatened with the death penalty. Joe has since recanted
So who wore Size 10 shoes? 1st Check: the family members+men who fathered her children. then her male visitors from that evening AND other evenings and other known associates.
ReplyDeletebtw it is NOT "impossible" that the size13 shoe of convicted killer did NOT leave the size 10 footprints. This may sound strange, bare with me: "Ted" Kaczynski aka The Unabomber made his shoe size SMALLER by attaching quite smaller soles to his much larger shoes.
The convicted men in this case don't seem to have Ted K's IQ but you must be careful when proclaiming something is "impossible", clearly you are incorrect.